Frustration spells frustration - October 30, 1999 - Andrew Kaufmann
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed within this column are those of the participants and the moderator, and do not necessarily reflect those of the GIA. I misplaced a guitar pick today. Luckily, I later found it in my shoe. There is coarse language and potentially offensive material afoot. Don't say we didn't warn you.
Hooray for fall time! I know I love the extra hour of sleep. Sleep. The land
where all is peachy keen yet hunky dory at the same time. I love it.
On another note, I'm going to say "That's right:" after almost everything, then
repeat myself. Feel free to count how many times I have to do it before it gets
really annoying. That's right: feel free to count.
A not so scary story. That's right: not so scary |
All hail the Big K (wait isn't that a store?)
Since it's Halloween here's a little horror story for you guys. I remember
way back when I was in Elementry school I was at Blockbuster video to get a
game. Final Fantasy Mystic Quest had just came out and I was contemplating
renting it. In fact I had been looking for it for a while. But when it came
down to it it was either Mystic Quest or Super Punch Out. I chose Super
Punch Out (one of the best action games on the SNES I think) thankfully.
This might not sound all that scary but thinking back it could've scarred me
from Final Fantasy games or even *gasp* from all RPGs. Who knows what that
would've lead to then. It makes me shudder. How about you Andrew you got
any gaming horror stories?
-Figure
|
You know, Mystic Quest really isn't that bad. As a matter of fact, I would go
as far as to say it is The Most Underrated RPG Ever. That's right: The Most
Underrated RPG Ever. I would rant about why, but to be totally honest I don't
feel like it. I think I'll skirt the issue and move right on to the second part
of the letter. That's right, I'm going to move right on to the second part of
the letter. Don't try to stop me.
Here I am, answering the second part of the letter. That's right: the second
part of the letter. Most of my horror stories about games revolve around trying
to get PC games to work right. Nothing particularly interesting, unfortunately.
But what about you guys? Surely you have some interesting video game horror
stories to tell. And since tomorrow is Halloween, I want you to tell them to me.
That's right: I want you to tell me your video game horror stories.
How LuckyDan got his name. That's right, his name |
AK,
Damn. Only 8% are women. Damn. That means there's almost 12 of us to
every one of them. My chances aren't good. Screw a good body; if I can find
a girlfriend who I can have with philosophical coversations about Final
Fantasy VIII or other RPGs, I'd be in heaven. Maybe if I start dressing like
THE MAN or LuckyDan, I might find one of those 8%.
Mike Drucker
|
Mike, I'm totally with you on this one. I feel your frustration. That's right,
I feel your frustration within me, burning at the very essence of my sanity. You'd
think that as a staff member of the awesome GIA, and weekend host of the letters
column, that there would be attractive and smart videogame girls just flocking to
me. I'm not saying that there aren't, because I have an image to maintain, but
let's just say that LuckyDan probably has more success with the women.
That's right: LuckyDan. How do you think he got the name, anyway? Duh.
THE MAN vs. THE WIMP (that's right: the wimp) |
Hey K-man
When I read Steve's comentary on how Gilgamesh sucks I just about fell off my
chair. First off Gilgamesh is THE MAN, secondly why do people keep oh taking
cheap shots at THE MAN but no one ever seems to make fun of Tonberrys. Not
the ones from Final Fantasy 7 who hand over a buttload of EXP if you manage
to beat them but the bastards from Final Fantasy 8. I mean I sit there from
7 minutes summoning GFs on him until the prick finally dies and then all he
gives me is a Chef's Knife and 1 AP!!!! I wouldn't be too bad if all I had
to beat was 10 of them to bet Tonberry King but I have to beat 18-22! Who
the hell likes to fight them! Whose idea was it to make it so you get no
EXP? Why did they put them in the game to begin with? This should genrate
some back feed.
-Figure Four
|
Tonberry is a wimp. That's right: a wimp. He can't even hold a candle (or lantern,
haha!) to Gilgamesh. Don't even both trying to defend Tonberry, folks. He sucks.
That's right: he sucks.
Possibly the longest, most irrelevant rant ever |
AK, if you don't mind I'm going to have to yell at Drew now. Try not to feel
left out.
Goddammit Drew, you just had to bring up the time machine didn't you?!
Didn't you?!? Don't get me started on time travel. Well now you've done it.
I'm going to have to tell you my cockeyed theories about time travel and the
ways of the universe. You've brought this upon yourself Cosner:
Time travel is impossible. Get over it everybody. There is no such thing
as, and never will be, a time machine. It's just not happening. Nobody has
any clue what so ever as to how to build one and from what one will be built.
There is simply no knowledge or resources on the subject.
And don't try to think your all smart, telling me about the whole "Black
Hole" thing, cause that just won't work either. For those of you who don't
know, some people believe that black holes are a tear in space which lead to
a different part of the universe or maybe even back in time since it will be
a rip in the time-space continuim, and as it was proven by Einstien, the
faster you go the more time slows down (we're talking astronomical terms
here, not like 50 miles an hour. So don't try to time your self with a
stopwatch, when driving your car). And since a black hole has such a
gravitational force it is believed that it will suck you into it at speeds
greater than that of the speed of light. But the reality of it is, that if a
ship were to go anywhere near a black hole, it will just break up or be
sucked into it and crash when it reaches the surface of the planet. And
that's essentially what a black hole is: a planet or a star, with so much
mass packed into it that its' gravitational field is simply too strong for
anything to escape it, and not a tear in space, despite what science fiction
novelists would have you believe. Nothing can escape it except for maybe
radiation. You see, for anything to leave the gravitational field of a
planet or star, it needs to move at a speed fast enough to surpass the force
of gravity, which that planet is creating. That's why a rocket has to move
at the approximate speed of a bullet leaving the barrel of a gun, in order to
reach space. Now the reason why a black hole is all dark is because not even
light can move fast enough (about 386,000,000 miles per second) to escape its
gravitational field, caused by its gigantic mass. It has a very big mass,
since the larger something is, the more gravity it creates. That's why it's
easy to jump high on the moon which is small, but considerably harder to do
down here on earth, which is larger by comparison.
But how do we know that Black Holes exist, if we can't see them and nothing
can escape them? Good question. Well, black holes emit very large amounts
of radiation that we can detect, even though the closest black hole (we
think) is just beyond Pluto, which is pretty far. But this would mean that
radiation would at one point move faster than the speed of light, and then
slows down, because all the forms of radiation that we know of, don't move
faster than light; this contradicts a theory by some scientist, whose name I
can't remember right now, that nothing can ever move faster than light. So
we kind of run into problems here. But fear not, because there is yet
another way to detect the presence of black holes, and that is the effect
that it has on light emmited from other stars. It bends the light and makes
it's appearance look similar to that of an eclipse. So now that I've cleared
that up you see that there is no possibility in how a black hole could make
you travel back in time.
Now let's just say that you somehow did manage to build a time machine, and
go back in time. The only use that it would have is to collect knowledge of
what it was like back then, but if you tried to change history, like try to
kill Hitler or something, then you would fail in your objective. The reason
for this is because time is unchangable, and whatever you went back to do,
you would have already done it when you reached the future. I know that it's
hard to understand, but try to bear with me here. Also, if you saw the movie
"12 Monkeys", then you would better understand at what I'm getting at. Let's
say that Bob wanted to go back and kill Hitler because Adolph killed his
parents. Bob would undoubtedly fail because of the fact that he didn't
succed 50 years ago. He was already back in time (as an adult) in the
1940's, when he was a child, and failed to kill Hitler. Hitler then in turn
killed Bob's parents, creating the incentive for him to go back in time.
Time will be a continuous loop, and it has to be that way because: Let's say
that Bob succeeded in his mission, and killed Hitler. Then Hitler would have
never killed Bob's parents and Bob (as an adult) would have have never went
back in time to kill Hitler, leaving Hitler in the past alive to kill Bob's
parents back in the 1940's, and that's is contradicting the whole reality of
Bob already killing Hitler. So you see this is why Bob must fail in his
mission, and anything he did (as an adult) in the 1940's would just be
playing out his role of time and further helping the outcome of Hiter killing
his parents. If you think that this is hard to understand, you should try
explaining it.
So these are my reasons on why time travel doesn't work, never will work, and
would be pointless even if you managed to do it. But hey, these are only the
opinions that I formed from my 17 years of existence, and we are all free to
have our own views. So disagree with me if you want. Or don't.
Man, this is so deserving of a Smartass award, but I know I can't get one
because it's Andy's turn, and he can't give out Drew's awards or else he will
be severely beaten. Another thing against me is that this has absolutely
nothing to do with videogames, and nobody cares about this crap except me.
But Andy, if your still reading this I'll give you MY award. It's called the
"Mikey B. Award," and I give it only to those who take the time and effort
out to read my long and pointless letters. You should be proud Andy; not
many people on the face of this earth can read my lengthly letters without
killing themselves afterwards. I would've drew a picture or told you the
side effects of leaving this award out in the sun or something, but I'm still
broken up at the fact that you didn't post my picture last week. **wipes
away tear**
-Mikey B.
|
That was a long and well thought out letter. What's up with that? Anyway,
you make some interesting points about time travel. I have no idea why they
deserved to be posted here, but what the heck. Slow letters day and all. That's
right: slow letters day, because of a late last update. Mikey, sorry for not
posting your picture. I didn't do it on purpose. As a matter of fact, looking
through my mail, I'm not sure I ever got your submission. That's right: I can't
find it. Resend it. If it was overlooked, then I might just post it late. If
I didn't post it because I didn't like it, though, then sorry. That's right:
I may or may not post it if you resend it.
Pokémon verbal patterns |
Salutations,
Since someone wrote in about Meowth being able to speak English, I
figured i'd be able to write an inquiry about the verbal habits of the little
beasts:
Why is it that Pokemon's vocal chords can easily form their own names,
but not anything else(though I guess Meowth would negate that theory)? More
importantly, since their names are made up of English letters and phonemes,
why can they not already speak English? And does no one else realize that
Pikachu is a mutant transvestite mouse?
There is one other thing I would like to mention. I have recently come
apon information revealing the true names of The Ambiguously Gay Duo. And
(since you are all desperatly waiting) they are: Gilgamesh and Enkidu. I
say this not in offense of the patron saint of The Gia, but simply as a
fulfilment of my duty as a super-villain to uncover the secrets of my
enemies. Though I must say that this gives new meaning to "THE MAN."
Vale,
Unferth, the Dark Knight of
California
|
Pikachu isn't a mouse, he's a gerbil. Get your facts straight. Who knows why they
can only say certain stuff... my wager it's years of careful genetic mutations by
scientists named Waldo. That's right: a gerbil. That's right: Waldo. (I'm trying
to throw you off my pattern by putting "that's right" out of order).
I spit upon thee for daring to define the fine name of Gilgamesh. Everyone
knows The Ambiguously Gay Duo is made up of Ace and Gary. Yeesh.
What system to get? |
I must start this with an apology as I am sure you will find this quite annoying. I have been surfing the net for three days now with little to show except a host of sites offering cheats. I am going to buy a console game system for my kids. I have a computer (obviously) and have never bothered with these (console) systems in the past. What is the BEST (games available and price, ease of use, relative price of system vs.value etc.), system available? I understand this is a rather difficult and far reaching question. In addition or as an alternative, would you point me to site that has comparisons and reviews (i.e. bench tests) of the various systems available? Thanks in advance for your help.
Grayson R. Pike
Columbus, Ohio
|
Not annoying at all, Mr. Pike. Just out of curiosity, are you related to Zebulon Pike?
That's right: Zebulon. Random thought. Anyway, if I could only buy one system on
this particular day, I'd go for the PlayStation. The Dreamcast is very nice, but
it's more expensive and has a smaller library of games. RPG-wise, it's very weak right
now. You can get a new PlayStation for $100 (that's right: $100 plus tax), and
have a blast finding titles to buy.
As far as straight up binary-crunching power, the Dreamcast is easily the "best"
system available right now, but the games library hurts it. There are some very
good games in several genres available for it, but the selection pales next to the
selection on the PlayStation.
I personally would stay away from the Nintendo 64. That's right: I'd stay away.
It's powerfully fast, but the games library is also very limited. The fact
the N64 is cart based has put a bit of a damper on 3rd party development.
Of course, the choice is up to you. It all depends on your tastes. You can
rent out systems at Blockbuster, play demos at stores, do stuff like that. It
can't hurt in making your decision. Good luck!
Closing Comments
I'm sure you are all thoroughly annoyed by now. That's right: thoroughly annoyed.
There are some writers that seem to insist on doing this kind of thing all the time.
Can you believe it? What a bore! I think I'll stop that nonsense now.
Don't forget to send in those Halloweenish gaming stories!
-Andrew Kaufmann
|
|
|
|