The Great Rivals -
October 4, 2001 - Brooke Bolander
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed
within this column are those of the participants and the
moderator, and do not necessarily reflect those of the
GIA. There is coarse language and potentially offensive
material afoot. I am a roving gambler, how do you do? Don't say we didn't warn you.
Pretty short column again, the reason being I couldn't get into my in-box an hour ago. I like to get this thing up by at least ten central time, so...it was annoying, to say the least.
I'd better finish this before my brain decides it's time to take a nap over my keyboard. 15 hours of sleep a day is just not enough.
Hail Gazuga!
I figured I'd have more fanart by now. |
Hey, Brooke. Even if you didn't have your taste in music, the
references to both Daria and MST3K would be enough to make me fall
passionately in love with you, in an anonymous-internet-stalker sort of
way. Just thought you should know.
I get the feeling the vast majority will prefer moniter over page, and
honestly, why not? I have absolutely no need to do anything video-game
related offline other than the actual playing. I've come to realize
that video game fans who provide services for free because, well, they
love games, will almost always do a better job than the paid
professionals. It's not just that the GIA's news, reviews, and
discussions happen to be free (though that's a huge drawing point, to be
sure), they're also more up-to-date, unbiased, and interesting than
anything I could buy. I'm not big on game guides, but when I'm
desperately stuck (or being a completionist when re-playing), some of
the guides at gamefaqs.com are better than a $15 strategy guide.
Going off on a slight tangent, this extends for me into the shady issue
of emulation. Normally I only emulate what I can't buy (i.e. Tales Of
Phantasia in English), but I'm aware that if a remake were ever
released, I would be essentially a thief. But why pay for a
professional translation of FFV when the free fan translation is, by all
accounts, better? Maybe there's no moral justification, but those who
do gaming stuff as a labor of love rather than a job choose to offer
their superior product for free, and I have few misgivings about
accepting it.
And totally shifting gears, let me mention that as if the bulk of
Nintendo Power wasn't redundant enough, I actually came across the
complete Zelda comic from NP in book form many moons ago. If I saw it
again today, I'd probably buy it.
-Toma Levine
|
Awww. I'm flattered and more than a little creeped out by that. Thanks!
You've got a point there. As will later be seen, some people trust the guys getting paid for their jobs more than they do us free-agent slobs, but think about that for a moment. They aren't doing it because they enjoy it, it's an obligation. These people have to put food on the table somehow, and when the illegal mushroom trade bottoms out, video game reviews probably sound like a good idea. But I have to wonder if you enjoy it as much when you HAVE to. Playing games for a living sounds fun, but you're not just playing FFX, you are also reviewing the latest Army Man game. Yikes.
But none of us here at the GIA are getting paid for this stuff, so we're not obligated to do jack squat. It's just a fun hobby, and an expensive one at that. Take that as you will.
Gimmie Free Stuff!! |
Brooke-
Let's see...gaming mags, wiht the excpetions of Game Informer and PSM all
pretty much currently suck. Way back when, there were tons of good ones, now,
theres not.
The point?
I have no way of telling whether or not TheGIA and other sites (after IGN got
crappy I've had a GIA only policy...you guys rock, they suck, that simple)
draw business from the mags.
I also don't care. The few good mags will still draw in cash, because aside
form any informatin you get, they also have enjoyable content. The others,
well, *cough* Gayme Pro*cough* can all rot in hell. So if a few losers (like
whatever asshole dreamed up the All Your Face Are Belong To Us article in the
only issue of that horrid rag I've read in years) lose their jobs and are
forced into the blue collar worker fields, who am I to care?
I'll still be here, reading TheGIA and working on that damn Chrono Trigger
fic of mine that seems to have halted, while the idiot cartoon losers from
certain mags look for jobs in hentai, and get rejected for a huge retro craze
for Jessica Rabbit.
Oh, and that whole free thing really helps when your stupid enough to buy a
car that costs as much as you can afford, and you hang by the skin of your
teeth cuz you blew all your extra cahs on a new wardrobe from Hot Topic.
DOWN WITH CAPITALISM!!! UP WITH FREE!!! GAMEPRO BAD!!! MONEY GOOD!!!
Peace,
Ray Stryker, who thought using his tabletop RPG last name would make his
sexiness rating go up by at least 31.415926 %
|
Now there's a good reason for just reading online sites - some of us poor saps don't have enough cash to buy a Coke, never mind buy a game magazine that costs $7.50. You could always do what I did when I had no money, though - just read them in the supermarket, then put 'em back when you're done. Back when I was a wee lass, I'd stand at the magazine section and read Game Players while my mother shopped for groceries. Sure I got some weird looks when hearty peals of laughter slipped from my lungs in the middle of Kroger's, but it was oh-so worth it.
Nowadays they put the mags in trendy plastic bags, though. Jackasses.
"Pfft, next you'll be saying Ice damages Fire!" |
Brooke,
I prefer websites to magazines. Every magazine but EGM was swept off its
feet by the utterly crap Legend of Dragoon, comparing it favorably not only
to the Final Fantasy series it was so heavily 'inspired' by, but Square's
excellent Chrono Cross. Next Gen will forever live in infamy by praising LOD
for introducing the bold 'new' concept of elemental damage (i.e. fire
damages water) to rpgs. By contrast, many of the big websites (including
the GIA) recognized LOD for the fetid pile it was. I subscribe to print
magazines mainly because many videogame companies tend to give them first
looks at new products (though the GIA did have FF9 artwork before anyone
else).
- Mark
|
I'd love to know how much they must be paying these guys to review games when they give shite like LOD high scores. Did Sony slip a little cash under the table or what?
I have a theory about reviewers at gaming publications, though. Just hear me out here.
Okay, so Billy the Game Reviewer has only played stuff like Madden '98 and Quake up until this point. Editor Man wants him to review this game, Legend of Dragoon, which looks a little fruity with the magic and crap, but has sweet! FMVs. Billy's gotta do what Editor Man tells him, so he plays it. And the pretty colours, swords, and explosions awe him, awe him so much he slaps a score of 9 on that baby. What did you expect? He doesn't know that it's nothing but a bunch of trite cliches and a tired fighting system - the man has never played an RPG in his life, how is he supposed to know that?
...What I'm trying to say here is that you can't make someone who's only played one genre of game play another kind and expect to get a correct score on it. I wouldn't attempt to play and correctly review a sports game, because I don't know what's good and what's bad in them. See what I mean? That's the problem with gaming magazines, I think. Either your staff had better like all sorts of games, or you should have one reviewer assigned to one type of game, a type they actually know about. The difference in this respect with game websites is that they usually stick to only one or two genres, which is good.
Whew, that was a mouthful.
Now who was it who needed to re-take English? |
Hmmm.What is better.Videogame magazines, or videogame sites?Well, I prefer a
gaming magazine any day over a rinky-dink site like yours.You see, anyone
can create a site (most that do are complete morons), but to run a
successful magazine, you HAVE to be good.Why do you think EGM, GamePro and
GameInformer have been around for more than ten years?
I don't like sites that much because most of them are horrible to navigate,
poorly done, and full of nimrods that seem like they failed every English
class they ever took.I am not saying "The GIA" is any of these things, but
the majority of game sites are.I don't care wheather you like it or not, but
you have to admit it.
Oh, and magazines may have a lot of ads, but they are less annoying then
those pop-up ads most sites have.At least the ads in mags are about upcoming
games or the sort, while computer pop-ups are about "Net Flips", or some
other crappy site.
I enjoy EGM more than any other mag out there and it kicks "The GIA's" ass
in oh so many ways.I love reading articles by Che Chou, Crispin Boyer, Dan
Hsu and Jeanne Kim much more than something by Brooke Bolander.
As my last bit of rant, I found your quip about costing some GamePro "lacky"
his job quite ammusing.For you to think that you are better than any editor
at that fine publication gives me a chuckle.
Well, that is all for now.Take care Brooke.No hard feelings, eh?
|
No hard feelings at all, my good Mystery Man. I found your letter quite 'ammusing' myself, matter of fact, especially the part where you called GamePro a "fine publication." No sweetheart, a fine publication would be National Geographic magazine. GamePro is the worst video game mag on stands, not to mention one of the worst magazines out there, period.
To run a successful gaming webpage you have to be good too, otherwise no one is going to bother to drop in and read it. The reason GamePro and EGM have been around for over ten years is the same reason Friends is still on the air - some people will read/watch/buy anything. You are a prime example of this phenomenon.
Oh, and next time remember to put spaces in-between your sentences, would you? I don't care 'wheather' or not you read my column, but if you're gonna write in, put a little more effort into making your letter readable, okay? Thanks.
Dennis Nedry, Game Reviewer. |
Brooke,
Just as an FYI, GamePro once printed a picture of Scary Larry. He looks
exactly like Newman from Seinfeld.
- Conor Edmiston
|
That really doesn't make me raise an eyebrow. I'm a little disappointed that he's not the drunken, unshaven fortysomething with a bottle of Jack Daniels in one hand and an unsteadily-held controller in the other I'd imagined, but a Newman look-alike would have been my second guess. I'll bet Bill could kick his ass, easily.
Better than reading People, that's for damn sure. |
Howdy.
Gaming magazines will always be around because, to put it simply, people
need something to read while they're on the can.
-Darrow
|
Very, very true. When you're away from an internet connection - be it in the car, on a plane, or, yes, sitting on the john - sometimes a gaming magazine becomes very, very desirable. Gotta kill time somehow. A word to the wise, though - don't read 'em in the bathtub. It only brings sorrow.
Comfort Food. |
Brooke,
I'll admit it: for most of my up-to-the-minute video gaming news, I rely heavily on The GIA and other such sites. Websites have the timeliness factor of journalism totally cornered.
And yet, I still buy game magazines.
Why, you ask? There's just something about magazines and print material in general that will always be appealing. Though the news the contain is usually a bit dated, the articles are still, for the most part, well-written and entertaining. Pkus, since I don't have a laptop, magazines are the only way I can have a game fix when a omputer isn't nearby.
Don't even get me started on upholding tradition.....
-End of Rambling-
-Megane, still mourning the loss of Megafan
|
Notch up another point for magazines - there's just something really nice about coming home with a new issue and curling up in bed to peruse the sucker from front to back. Plus they smell nice. Mmmm...printy fresh.
It's the same reason the Internet will never wipe out books - there's just something a bit more personal about them at times. Some people like having something more real to look at, if you get what I'm saying. No server crash or virus will ever take my back copies of Game Players away from me, and that is something to be thankful for.
Plus some of them have pull-out posters! Bitchin!!
Watch me veer waaaaaay off-topic. |
Yo, Brooke,
Thanks for bringing back my oh-so-fond memories of Sifl and Olly. That
show rocked, while it lasted. Crescent Fresh all the way. Anyhoo, just
thought I'd point out that Skies of Arcadia does have an Enc-None, so to
speak. Once you get the Yafutoman mods to the Delphinus, flying above and
below the clouds makes the encounter rate drop to 0. Quite handy for
flying from place to place- just drop below, then pop right back up when
you get to your destination.
Now let's just see if you can out-rock Satan.
--Sean
|
Ahhh Sifl and Olly, the only show other than Daria I've ever enjoyed on MTV. Of course, both of them have been cancelled to make more room for TRL Midnight, but we'll always have the memories.
For those of you not 'in the know,' S&O was a weird puppet show that MTV used to play late at night in 1997 or '98. It had the basic attention span of Space Ghost, and...well, you just really had to see it. So when I say "Crescent Fresh" I'm just quoting a deranged sock puppet. Fair enough? I know you wouldn't expect any less from me.
Oh, and you can sneak into the Valuan Slums with that drop-below trick in Skies of Arcadia. And the people say different stuff! Yay!
Closing Comments:
Okay, okay, so I'll shut up about gaming mags. It's passed through my system like the Ebola virus, ravaging everything it touched, and I'm sure you guys are ready to move on. Right? Right.
I was thinking...why the hell aren't there more gay people in games? Or anything other than waiflike caucasians, for that matter? Is there any reason for this? I'd like to see some more diversity, personally. Do you think we ever will? Or will it be straight white boys with spiky yellow hair from here on out? Blaaaand. How would you like to see game developers diversify? Answer my damn questions, alright? I'm running out of question marks.
- Brooke Bolander, who would like to see a game with a Native American female as the lead.
|